en information richness (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en cuteness (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en credibility (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en physical attractiveness (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en freshenness (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en quality (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en aesthetic quality (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en badness (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en intricacy (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en evaluative quantity (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en non aspectual quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en moral quality (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en goodness generic (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en relevancy (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en difficulty (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012
en reliability (n)
― IsA ⟶
Weight: 1.0
en evaluative quantity (n) Source: OpenCyc 2012